Edited text by Cam Wayland (Hunky Dory).
As some of you may recall some time ago I changed my house batteries from AGM to Lithium (LiFePO4). While very happy with the battery swap overall some additional fine tuning of the system was required to get the best out of the complete package, especially solar charging.
While I had a flexible solar panel stitched onto the bimini, it had been damaged in a hail storm and you could see “dings” on some of the cells. Testing showed it was outputting a reasonable voltage i.e. >15V but the current was minuscule at < 1A, so not very effective in charging your batteries after a night of the fridge being turned on. I replaced the panel with a new 200W flexible panel and changed my old PWM solar regulator to a Victron MPPT 15/75, which had Bluetooth connectivity so I could easily monitor the solar charge output. The following text is one of the best explanations I have found explaining PWM & MPPT and was taken from a solar specialist’s web site. It covers the difference in regulators and why if you have Lithium batteries a MPPT regulator is probably the best choice. I now regularly get a real-world input of consistently around 8A and can certainly recommend the change/upgrade.
Why do you need a solar charge controller?
A solar charge controller (frequently called regulator) is similar to a regular battery charger, i.e. it regulates the current flowing from the solar panel into the battery bank to avoid overcharging the batteries. As with a regular quality battery charger, various battery types are accommodated, the absorption voltage, float voltage can be selectable and sometimes the time periods and/or the tail current are also selectable. They are especially suited for lithium-iron-phosphate batteries as once fully charged the controller then stays at the set float or holding voltage of around 13.6V (3.4V per cell) for the remainder of the day.
The most common charge profile is the same basic sequence used on a quality mains charger, i.e. bulk mode > absorption mode > float mode. Entry into bulk charge mode occurs at:
- sunrise in the morning
- if the battery voltage drops below a defined voltage for more than a set time period, e.g. 5 seconds (re-entry)
This re-entry into bulk mode works well with lead-acid batteries as the voltage drop and drop is worse than it is for lithium-based batteries which maintain a higher more stable voltage throughout the majority of the discharge cycle.
Lithium batteries (LiFePO4) do not benefit from re-entry into bulk mode during the day as the internal impedance of the lithium batteries increases at high (and low) states of charge as indicated by the orange vertical lines in the chart below and it is only necessary to occasionally balance the cells which can only be done around the absorption voltage. A related reason is to avoid the rapid and large variation in voltage that will occur in these regions as large loads are switched on and off.
Lithium batteries do not have a defined “float voltage”, and therefore the “float voltage” of the controller should be set to be at or just below the “charge knee voltage” (as indicated in the chart below) of the LiFePO4 charge profile, i.e. 3.4V per cell or 13.6V for a 12V battery. The controller should hold this voltage for the remainder of the day after bulk charging the battery.
The difference between PWM and MPPT solar charge controllers
The crux of the difference is:
- With a PWM controller the current is drawn out of the panel at just above the battery voltage, whereas:
- With an MPPT controller the current is drawn out of the panel at the panel “maximum power voltage” (think of an MPPT controller as being a “smart DC-DC converter”)
You often see slogans such as “you will get 20% or more energy harvesting from an MPPT controller”. This extra actually varies significantly and the following is a comparison assuming the panel is in full sun and the controller is in bulk charge mode. Ignoring voltage drops and using a simple panel and simple math as an example:
Panel maximum power current (Imp) = 5.0A
Panel maximum power voltage (Vmp) = 18V
Battery voltage = 13V (battery voltage can vary between say 10.8V fully discharged and 14.4V during absorption charge mode). At 13V the panel amps will be slightly higher than the maximum power amps, say 5.2A.
With a PWM controller the power drawn from the panel is 5.2A * 13V = 67.6 watts. This amount of power will be drawn regardless of the temperature of the panel, provided that the panel voltage remains above the battery voltage.
With an MPPT controller the power from the panel is 5.0A * 18V = 90 watts, i.e. 25% higher. However this is overly optimistic as the voltage drops as temperature increases; so assuming the panel temperature rises to say 30°C above the standard test conditions (STC) temperature of 25°C and the voltage drops by 4% for every 10°C, i.e. total of 12% then the power drawn by the MPPT will be 5A * 15.84V = 79.2W i.e. 17.2% more power than the PWM controller.
In summary there is an increase in energy harvesting with the MPPT controllers, but the percentage increase in harvesting varies significantly over the course of a day.
The differences in PWM and MPPT operation:
PWM
A PWM (pulse width modulation) controller can be thought of as an (electronic) switch between the solar panels and the battery:
- The switch is ON when the charger mode is in bulk charge mode.
- The switch is “flicked” ON and OFF as needed (pulse width modulated) to hold the battery voltage at the absorption voltage.
- The switch is OFF at the end of absorption while the battery voltage drops to the float voltage.
- The switch is once again “flicked” ON and OFF as needed (pulse width modulated) to hold the battery voltage at the float voltage.
Note that when the switch is OFF the panel voltage will be at the open circuit voltage (Voc) and when the switch is ON the panel voltage will be at the battery voltage + voltage drops between the panel and the controller.
The best panel match for a PWM controller:
The best panel match for a PWM controller is a panel with a voltage that is just sufficiently above that required for charging the battery and taking temperature into account, typically, a panel with a Vmp (maximum power voltage) of around 18V to charge a 12V battery. These are frequently referred to as a 12V panel even though they have a Vmp of around 18V.
MPPT
The MPPT controller could be considered to be a “smart DC-DC converter”, i.e. it drops the panel voltage (hence “house panels” could be used) down to the voltage required to charge the battery. The current is increased in the same ratio as the voltage is dropped (ignoring heating losses in the electronics), just like a conventional step-down DC-DC converter.
The “smart” element in the DC-DC converter is the monitoring of the maximum power point of the panel which will vary during the day with the sun strength and angle, panel temperature, shading and panel(s) health. The “smarts” then adjusts the input voltage of the DC-DC converter – in “engineering speak” it provides a matched load to the panel.
The best panel match for an MPPT controller:
To match a panel to an MPPT controller it is advisable to check the following:
- The panel open circuit voltage (Voc) must be under the permitted voltage.
- The Voc must be above the “start voltage” for the controller to “kick-in”.
- The maximum panel short circuit current (Isc) must be within the range specified.
- The maximum array wattage – some controllers allow this to be “over-sized”, e.g the Redarc Manager 30 is permitted to have up to 520W attached.
Choosing the right solar controller/regulator
The PWM is a good low-cost option
• for smaller systems
• where the efficiency of the system is not critical, e.g trickle charging.
• for solar panels with a maximum power voltage (Vmp) of up to 18V for charging a 12V battery (36V for 24V battery, etc).
The MPPT controller is best
• For larger systems where the additional 20%* or more energy harvesting is worthwhile
• When the solar array voltage is substantially higher than the battery voltage e.g. using house panels, for charging 12V batteries
* An MPPT controller will yield higher returns compared with a PWM controller as the panel voltage increases. I.e. a 160W eArche panel using 36 conventional monocrystalline cells with a maximum power amps of 8.4A will provide around 8.6A at 12V; while the 180W panel having 4 more cells will provide the same amperage but 4 additional cells increases the panel voltage by 2V. A PWM controller will not harvest any additional energy, but an MPPT controller will harvest an additional 11.1% (4 / 36) from the 180W panel.
For the same principle, all panels using SunPower cells with more than 32 cells require an MPPT charge controller otherwise a PWM controller will harvest the same energy from 36, 40, 44 cell panels as it does from a 32 cell panel.
Extracted from the website https://www.solar4rvs.com.au
Recent Comments